Wednesday, March 10, 2010

Last night I saw a great show about a 911 conspiracy. There were great arguments to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the government planned the whole thing. All the evidence presented by one side made it crystal clear. As long as there was nobody there to discredit the findings, everyone is happy - right?
This morning I listened to a few people I work with who, unless challenged, can come up with some pretty interesting and profound statements. Kind of like the 911 conspiracy experts, they can justify about any opinion unless challenged by rational thought. Someone else has already probably coined this and own the copyright on it, but my title for these people are "Five Minute Experts".
A five minute expert is a person who really wants to sound smart so they listen to what alot of other really smart people tell them. They soak up really cool sounding facts, figures, catch phrases, buzzwords, in order to prepare. They prepare for the perfect moment when they have a really important group of people at hand ready soak up the really cool and profound knowledge that has been neatly prepared. The most important part of the preparation, however, is the exit plan. A five minute expert is not usually any good at backing up the really cool and profound information they share, so as a way to deal with any skeptics, they find cool and sometimes comical ways to deflect the counterpoints made by anyone who doesn't buy in.
One great way to do this is by using absolutes. Here is an example:

Guy One: "Students need to learn their lesson when it comes to behavior on my class so I kick anyone out who misbehaves."

Guy Two: "Wow. How do you handle that kid who is having a really bad day at home and happened to be in your class when they broke down?"

Guy One: (with some eye shifting and collar tugging) "Are you trying to tell me that every kid who acts like a jerk in my class just happened to walk into my class the very instant that they lost control over a bad family life. Really. Every kid. That doesn't make sense."

Guy One: "No. I am just saying that some kids have issues that might explain their behavior."

Guy Two: "Why do you hate expectations. I believe in America. What's wrong with liking America?"

Guy One: (thought but not spoken) "This guy has never developed a critical thought that didn't involve a professional sports team or an episode of American Idol."

I am not saying that I am the enlightened one. I agree that I have some pretty concrete opinions about life, school, politics, or what not that I won't waver from. A rational person has to concur, however, that to build an opinion, one must understand in one's own mind why such an opinion is made. There is no such thing as a black and white topic so some independent thought is important to decide which side of what arguments you want to be on. If you can't take a position, chew it up, spit it out, and make sense of it - you might be a "Five Minute Expert".

PS- I also hate cats. Challenge me on it and you'll see that at least on this one, I'm an "All Day Long Expert"!

1 comment:

  1. The first comment I scrolled on the handout "The Case Against Zero" was my own article - "The Case for doing your fu*&^%g work and turning it in on time."

    The real world doesn't doesn't give partial credit. If I'm not mistaken, the real world gives plenty of zeros. Just try not showing up for work for a week and see the number of dollars you earn.

    ReplyDelete